Expert Systems with Applications

The -Bonacci weighted sequence space {ell}(,) is introduced for [&ge;] 2, 1 [&le;] < {infty}, and > 0). It is proved to be a Banach space which is isometrically isomorphic to {ell}, with an unconditional Schauder basis. The space is also reflexive and uniformly convex. Its strict inclusion chain, continuous dual, and asymptotic truncation estimate of order - / are also established. Based on this framework, Scaled &#119898-BonacciNet is proposed as a lightweight CNN that rescales Fibonacci-Net channels using the dominant &#119898-Bonacci root and employs depth wise separable convolutions. Tribonacci-Net achieved 96.09% accuracy and a 0.9581 macro F1-score on the 15-class Brain MRI dataset using 0.85 million parameters and 0.366 GFLOPs. Pentanacci-Net attained 95.87% accuracy on the 44-class dataset while reducing parameters and FLOPs by 47.10% and 44.48%, respectively. On the CKD ultrasound dataset, Hexanacci-Net achieved 83.75% accuracy and a 0.7941 macro F1-score, with corresponding reductions of 50.37% and 45.10%. These findings support dominant-root scaling as a structured approach to lightweight CNN design.

Background. In people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), postprandial glucose weighs on glycaemic control, and carbohydrate counting is difficult. Patients can describe their meal but rarely quantify it. Objective. To assess (1) whether a small open large language model (LLM), fine-tuned on public data, estimates the carbohydrate content of a meal described in words, and (2) what this carbohydrate adds to the prediction of the postprandial glucose rise in two public cohorts. Methods. Step 1: the Qwen3-4B LLM was fine-tuned with QLoRA on Nutrition5k dishes and compared with an automatically matched USDA food composition table and with Qwen3-4B and Qwen3-8B used without training, on test dishes (internal control) and on 100 real meals of ShanghaiT2DM patients, whose reference carbohydrate was computed from the recorded quantities. Step 2: the maximum glucose rise between 0 and 120 minutes ({Delta}Gmax) was predicted by personalised gradient boosting (M2), compared with a spline linear regression and with the Chronos-2 foundation model, using only information available at meal start and person-level cross-validation, in ShanghaiT2DM (people with T2D recruited in two Shanghai hospitals; carbohydrate estimated by the LLM) and CGMacros (free-living adults in Santa Barbara, California; carbohydrate entered in the dataset, no text). Step 3: the model was transferred between datasets. 95% confidence intervals (CI) were obtained by cluster BCa bootstrap (2,000 resamples). Results. On the 100 real meals, the carbohydrate mean absolute error (MAE) of the fine-tuned model was 12.2 [9.9, 15.2] g, almost half that of the table (22.6 g; paired difference -10.5 [-16.8, -6.0] g) and nearly a third of that of the same model without fine-tuning (34.3 g), with a bias of -10.3 g; on test dishes it was 2.2 [2.0, 2.5] g. Personalised gradient boosting (M2) reached a correlation between predicted and observed rises of r = 0.63 [0.55, 0.69] in CGMacros (1,286 meals, 45 adults) and 0.49 [0.42, 0.54] in ShanghaiT2DM (2,339 meals, 99 people with T2D), about twice the linear reference (r = 0.32 and 0.23); for a rise above 50 mg/dL, its area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was 0.80 and 0.74, versus 0.64 and 0.68 with pre-meal glucose alone. Adding carbohydrate to pre-meal glucose changed r by 0.095 [0.068, 0.128] in CGMacros and by 0.004 [-0.010, 0.017] in ShanghaiT2DM; difference between datasets: 0.091 [0.060, 0.126]. Applied from one dataset to the other, the model lost correlation ({Delta}r = -0.11 [-0.17, -0.05] towards ShanghaiT2DM and -0.12 [-0.19, -0.04] towards CGMacros). The full "text [-&gt;] LLM [-&gt;] glucose" chain was evaluated in ShanghaiT2DM only. Conclusion. An open 4-billion-parameter LLM, fine-tuned with QLoRA on public data and usable offline, almost halves the error of carbohydrate counting for real meals described in words compared with an automatically matched table, with an underestimation of large meals. Personalised gradient boosting, based on pre-meal glucose and the person's usual response, doubles the correlation of a linear reference for predicting the glucose rise in both cohorts. Carbohydrate improved this prediction in CGMacros but not in ShanghaiT2DM; the two datasets differ in many respects, and the cause of this gap is not established.

Aims: To understand how users believe continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) changes their behaviour, which app features they credit, and whether endorsing more mechanisms of action (MoAs) is linked to reported diet and physical activity change. Methods: We surveyed 112 U.S. adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who had used a Dexcom or Abbott Libre CGM within 12 months. Participants rated 26 MoA statements mapped to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model, identified contributing app features, and reported CGM-attributed diet and physical activity change. Logistic regression examined MoA count and COM-B domains as predictors of behaviour change. Results: Participants (mean age 54.5 years; 60.7% female) reported dietary (82.1%) and physical activity (46.4%) change and endorsed a median of 18 MoAs, most often relating to knowledge, skills and behavioural consequences. Real-time glucose and graphs were attributed to many MoAs. Each additional MoA was associated with higher odds of dietary (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.15-1.44) and physical activity change (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.16-1.43). Motivation made the strongest distinct contribution among COM-B domains. Conclusions: Users perceive CGM as engaging many behavioural mechanisms; endorsing more was linked to behaviour change. Motivation may be a key target for CGM-based behavioural support.

Computed tomography (CT) interpretation requires recognition of the anatomical level of each slice. Classification may facilitate preprocessing and AI-assisted fracture diagnosis. We developed deep learning models to classify craniofacial CT slices into six anatomical categories. A total of 11,769 images were collected from a multicenter database involving 10 Japanese university hospitals and the public Head-Neck-Radiomics-HN1 dataset. Patients were divided into training (70%) and evaluation (30%) sets. Five CNN architectures were trained from scratch, and hard- and soft-voting ensembles were evaluated. Individual-model accuracy ranged from 94.72% to 96.09%; the hard-voting ensemble achieved 96.46% accuracy (Cohen's k = 0.954). Although performance differed among individual models (Cochran's Q = 99.29, p < 0.001), the ensemble did not significantly outperform EfficientNetV2B1 (McNemar's p = 0.163). Errors occurred mainly between adjacent anatomical regions. Deep learning can classify craniofacial CT slices accurately and may support automated dataset organization and AI-assisted fracture diagnosis. External validation is needed.

Estimating the correlation between subject-specific rates of change is a common objective in longitudinal studies. A natural approach is to fit ordinary least squares regressions per subject and correlate the resulting slope estimates directly. Under complete data, this slopes-first estimator is algebraically equivalent to a contrast-based plug-in estimator derived from the joint variance-covariance matrix of the two signals across time. Under independent dropout, however, the slopes-first approach implicitly applies heterogeneous weights across missing-data patterns, introducing bias whenever the cross-covariance between the two signals is not constant over time. We formalise this result and propose an unbiased alternative that estimates the joint covariance matrix before applying the contrast. We further extend our results to include covariates as well. Simulations confirm that the slopes-first estimator is biased under non-constant cross-covariance while the proposed alternative remains unbiased. Further, we show in a real-world example that the two estimators can lead to different scientific conclusions and recommend that researchers working with longitudinal data inspect the missing data pattern to make an informed decision about the estimator of choice.

Background: Conventional performance metrics do not indicate whether artificial intelligence (AI)-platforms and radiologists are right or wrong on the same examinations, nor whether their non-agreement is more often beneficial or harmful. Objective: To develop, illustrate, and apply directional metrics quantifying non-agreement between radiologists and AI-platforms against a common reference standard, and to adapt a fragility-based framework for quantifying the statistical robustness of these metrics. Methods: We defined Positive Non-Agreement (PNA, AI-platform correct, radiologist incorrect), Negative Non-Agreement (NNA, radiologist correct, AI-platform incorrect), and Net Non-Agreement (NENA, their difference). Metrics were illustrated in three hypothetical scenarios of 1,000 examinations each and applied to three previously published AI-radiologist studies on pulmonary embolism and mammography. Bootstrap confidence intervals were calculated, and a reclassification fragility index (FI) quantified the minimum case reclassification needed to remove statistical support for NENA's direction. Results: In illustration, NENA was positive in two scenarios and negative in one. In the three published studies, NENA ranged from -4.18% to +10.74% and decreased consistently with increasing radiologist experience (junior residents, +6.27%; consultants, +1.45%), a gradient driven primarily by declining PNA with modest increase in NNA. The reclassification FI was defined for all three illustrative scenarios (range, 0.10%-1.70%) and for six of the seven comparisons from these studies (range, 0.34%-4.31%), but not for the weakest comparison, whose confidence interval for NENA included zero. Conclusions: PNA, NNA, and NENA provide a directional, case-level complement to conventional performance metrics for AI-radiologist non-agreement. The accompanying reclassification FI offers a statistically grounded, generalizable method for quantifying their robustness.

Longitudinal clinical cohorts contain heterogeneous progression patterns that are obscured by coarse diagnostic labels. Discovering these latent progression phenotypes requires models that distinguish patients not only by their outcomes, but also by how their clinical trajectories evolve. This paper proposes TRACE, an interpretable temporal phenotyping method that enables the learning of outcome-informed progression phenotypes from longitudinal trajectories. TRACE combines a trajectory- and outcome-aware contrastive objective with a probabilistic predictive phenotype layer, encouraging phenotypes to capture progression structure while remaining predictive of diagnostic state. A dual-attention mechanism further supports interpretation by identifying the visits and clinical variables most associated with each phenotype assignment. TRACE is evaluated on the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort for cognitive disease modeling, showing improved performance in both diagnostic prediction and phenotype discovery compared with other temporal phenotyping baselines. Finally, by allowing the number of phenotypes to exceed the diagnostic labels, TRACE enables discovering additional progression patterns that are not captured by labels defined a priori.

Biomedical artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly relies on heterogeneous data sources, yet differences in data structure, terminology, evidence quality, and provenance complicate their integration into reliable knowledge resources. Here, we develop an evidence-aware framework for processing and integrating heterogeneous pharmacovigilance data from FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) reports, biomedical literature, clinical trials, and electronic health records in Mass General Brigham. The framework combines large language model (LLM)-based information extraction, ontology-driven semantic normalization, cross-source evidence assessment, statistical and machine learning-based prioritization, and ingredient-based adverse drug event (ADE) relationship inference to transform heterogeneous evidence into a structured and evidence-based knowledge resource. The constructed knowledge system contains 11,588 drug nodes, 44,843 ingredient nodes, 3,275 ADE nodes, 993 indication nodes, and more than 2.47 million relationships, with each drug-ADE relationship assigned a confidence score. We further developed a drug-level web interface for accessing the knowledge resource and validated its utility in downstream AI tasks. Specifically, incorporating the developed knowledge resource improved the comprehensiveness, relevance, and overall quality of LLM-based drug-specific ADE synthesis and improved the precision and F1 score of clinical ADE relation extraction. These results demonstrate that AI-assisted processing combined with evidence-aware curation can transform heterogeneous biomedical evidence into reusable, AI-ready knowledge with explicit provenance and evidence strength information. The framework provides a general strategy for integrating heterogeneous biomedical data to support reproducible knowledge construction and downstream biomedical AI applications.

Purpose: To evaluate whether visually assessed high-quality prostate MRI, as defined by the Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) scoring system, is sufficient to ensure consistent AI model performance, or whether hidden acquisition-related technical effects introduce variability that cannot be detected through visual inspection. Methods: This retrospective study included 568 bpMRI scans from seven institutions, classified using PI-QUAL v2 into high-quality (scores 2-3) and low-quality (score 1) groups. Quantitative image quality features were extracted using MRQy from T2w and ADC sequences. Three experiments were conducted on high-quality scans: (1) unsupervised clustering to identify hidden technical batch effects; (2) V-Net models (M) for prostate capsule segmentation on T2w using single-cluster and balanced multi-cluster training strategies; and (3) VoxelMorph-based deformable registration (M2) to align ADC maps to T2w images. Performance metrics included DSC, precision, recall, volume ratio, HD95, ASSD, and TRE. Kruskal-Wallis tests assessed cross-cluster variability, Two One-Sided Tests (TOST) evaluated performance equivalence, and bootstrap resampling quantified training efficiency. Results: Clustering identified four clusters among 277 high-quality bpMRI scans. Single-cluster models showed variable performance (DSC=0.41-0.85) with significant batch effects (p<0.001), even with 140 training samples. The balanced multi-cluster model (n=60) eliminated batch effects (p=0.075), achieved equivalent performance (p<0.001), and demonstrated 2.23-fold greater training efficiency despite using 2.3-fold fewer samples. Registration performance also varied significantly across clusters (TRE=0.86-5.47 mm, p<0.001). Conclusion: Acquisition-related batch effects significantly impact AI generalizability in prostate MRI, even among high-quality scans. Quantitative clustering enables detection of technical variations and supports diversity-aware training strategies that achieve equivalent performance with 2.3-fold fewer samples while eliminating batch effects.

Purpose: Posterior pharyngeal wall (PPW) thickening is a common structural manifestation of treatment-related internal lymphedema in patients with head and neck cancer and can be evaluated using lateral videofluoroscopic images acquired during modified barium swallow (MBS) studies. However, no standardized method currently exists for quantitative measurement. Methods: This two-phase methodological study first conducted a scoping review to characterize existing approaches to PPW thickness measurement and identify the principal factors contributing to variation in PPW thickness measurement. Eight studies were identified with variation observed across these measurement factors. An empirical reliability study was then performed using 107 MBS studies from 93 Head and Neck Cancer patients. Two independent raters annotated 10 anatomical landmarks on pre-swallow and post-swallow resting frames, and a computer-assisted algorithm quantitatively generated seven candidate PPW thickness measurements based on different vertebral reference points and measurement directions. Reliability was assessed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results: Inter-rater reliability was highest for the measurement originating from the midpoint of C3 and extending perpendicular to the anterior C3 surface (ICC, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.83). Among the normalization references, C2-C4 vertebral length demonstrated greater reliability than C3 vertebral length, with an ICC of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.91). No significant differences were observed between pre-swallow and post-swallow PPW thickness measurements across the evaluated approaches. Conclusions: These findings provide a methodological foundation for more standardized and reliable quantification of PPW thickness, with potential to expand the role of MBS from the functional evaluation of swallowing to include quantitative characterization of pharyngeal structural abnormalities.

Personalized medicine aims to tailor treatments to individual patients, but its implementation is limited by scarce clinical resources and heterogeneous treatment effects. Electronic health records now offer longitudinal data that can support data-driven therapy selection. We focus on SGLT2 inhibitors, medications with broad metabolic and cardiovascular benefits, whose clinical impact varies significantly based on individual patient profiles. We propose a counterfactual Structural Causal Model (SCM) to estimate individual treatment effects (ITE) of SGLT2 inhibitors from observational data. The model assumes counterfactual stability and uses a Gumbel-Max sampling mechanism to capture stochastic treatment assignment while enabling differentiable inference. Optimal treatments are defined by maximizing the counterfactual value of future diagnostic outcomes. We evaluate the Counterfactual Gumbel-Max SCM using a doubly robust value estimator and show that, across diagnostic categories, it outperforms real-world prescriptions in predicted treatment value, highlighting subpopulations where SGLT2 inhibitors yield superior outcomes. By integrating causal inference with electronic health data, this framework provides individualized counterfactual reasoning about SGLT2 treatment effects and can support clinicians in identifying optimal therapies for type 2 diabetes and comorbid conditions.

INTRODUCTION: The digital clock drawing test (dCDT) is a cognitive screening tool capturing high-resolution pen-movement data. Existing approaches for classifying cognitive impairment from dCDTs rely on selected features or image-based methods. We propose representing dCDTs as structural networks to classify cognitive impairment and characterize spatial organization in clock drawings. METHODS: Weighted networks were constructed from 3,362 Framingham Heart Study participants, with and without cognitive impairment. Network representations were generated separately for command and copy conditions, with nodes representing pre-defined clock components (digits, hands, clock face) and edges capturing pairwise spatial relationships between components. Random forest models and graph convolutional networks were trained to predict cognitive impairment from the networks. Models were benchmarked against demographics-only and established summary feature baselines. RESULTS: Network-based models achieved AUC values comparable to the established summary feature baseline across command-only and copy-only conditions. Differences in spatial organization between the cognitively intact and impaired groups were greatest in the upper-right clock region, involving digits 1 and 2, the clock hands, and the surrounding clock face. Differences between the command and copy networks were larger among cognitively impaired participants. DISCUSSION: The proposed network representations provide an objective, scalable, and flexible framework for representing clock drawings for use in classification models. dCDT networks matched the predictive performance of established summary feature-based approaches and identified clock regions where spatial organization differed by cognitive status. After external validation, this approach has the potential to be incorporated within a clinical workflow to support automated and interpretable cognitive screening.

Flow cytometry is central to clinical hematology, generating extensive archives comprising billions of single-cell profiles linked to expert-derived diagnostic summaries. While these records represent a largely untapped repository of collective expert knowledge, the underlying single-cell annotations required for supervised machine learning are typically not recorded in a standardized, accessible format. We present IMPGAT (implicit gating), a weakly supervised multiple-instance learning framework that reconstructs single-cell gating strategies directly from existing sample-level cell-type frequency distributions. The model utilizes an induced set attention mechanism to map single-cell marker profiles to specific cell populations, requiring neither explicit cell-level labels nor unsupervised clustering during training. We evaluate the framework on acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cohorts, totaling 711 measurements from 268 individuals and 240 million single cells. In ALL, the model's quantification of cell-type abundances shows no statistically significant difference from human inter-expert variability. In AML, the framework achieves blast quantification on par with a recently established supervised state-of-the-art model that relies on explicit single-cell annotations for training. Error analysis shows that mismatches between model predictions and expert gating primarily involve expert-labeled non-cellular events, reflecting the non-incorporation of any explicit physical prior knowledge (such as the geometric relationships traditionally used to identify doublets and debris in scatter cytograms) in model training. Conversely, model certainty correlates with phenotypic borderline cases where manual bisection is inherently difficult. Our approach enables the systematic utilization of retrospective clinical records for the development of automated, standardized gating logic and is applicable to broader high-throughput contexts, such as large-scale immune monitoring or phenotypic drug screening.

Objectives To evaluate discrepancies between radiologists and referring physicians in the interpretation of diagnostic probabilities conveyed by common Japanese expressions used in radiology reports. Materials and Methods Fifteen expressions commonly used to convey diagnostic probabilities in radiology reports were selected by five attending radiologists. An anonymous online survey was distributed to 26 radiologists and 33 referring physicians at a single institution. Participants assigned a diagnostic probability (from 0% to 100% in 10% increments) to each expression. Differences in median probabilities between radiologists and referring physicians were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Variability in interpretation was assessed using interquartile range (IQR), with IQR [&ge;] 30% defined as substantial variability. Results All radiologists (26/26) and 97% of referring physicians (32/33) completed the survey. Seven of the 15 expressions showed statistically significant differences in interpretation between radiologists and referring physicians: "c/w" (80% vs. 60%; p = 0.031), the Japanese equivalents of "present" (100% vs. 100%; p = 0.024), "suspect of" (80% vs. 70%; p = 0.007), "possibly" (50% vs. 70%; p < 0.001), "unlikely" (10% vs. 10%; p = 0.022), "cannot be ruled out" (25% vs. 40%; p < 0.001), and "not inconsistent with" (80% vs. 90%; p = 0.008). Substantial variability in interpretation (IQR [&ge;] 30%) was observed for four expressions: "cannot be ruled out" (IQR, 10%-40%), "s/o" (IQR, 60%-90%), "c/w" (IQR, 50%-90%), and "not inconsistent with" (IQR, 70%-100%). Conclusion This study revealed that nearly half of the Japanese expressions commonly used to convey diagnostic probabilities were interpreted differently by radiologists and referring physicians. These discrepancies highlight the need for a standardized lexicon to improve clarity and consistency in radiology reporting.

Lesion network mapping (LNM) has provided a compelling framework in clinical neuroscience, linking focal brain damage at heterogeneous anatomical locations to shared functional networks across behavioural syndromes. Recently, the methodological specificity of LNM has come under discussion following observations that derived network maps tend to converge onto the normative connectome's generic degree distribution. While current efforts largely treat this convergence as a statistical inference challenge addressable via post-hoc spatial null models or individual-level analyses, we identify a foundational upstream measurement artifact operating within individual patients: the lesion "bystander effect". Because pathological lesions follow biological constraints rather than functional brain parcellations, a typical lesion encapsulates both a symptom-driving critical node and surrounding asymptomatic bystander tissue. By averaging connectivity profiles across the entire lesion mask, LNM mechanically dilutes focal clinical signals. Across empirical clinical cohorts, individual-level machine learning classifiers, synthetic within-cohort lesion unions, and whole-brain spherical simulations, we demonstrate that increasing lesion extent deterministically drives network maps toward the connectome degree vector following a mathematical power law. Fulfilling the clinical promise of LNM will therefore require computational strategies that isolate the causal functional core from surrounding bystander tissue prior to network projection.

Blood-based neurofilament light (NfL) is associated with all-cause mortality, but whether this reflects neuroaxonal injury or overlaps with cognitive and functional decline remains unclear. We followed 559 individuals aged 92-107 from three oldest-old cohorts for up to 16 years: cognitively healthy Dutch centenarians and two population-based Danish cohorts. Plasma biomarkers (A{beta}42/40, A{beta}40, A{beta}42, pTau-181, pTau-181/A{beta}42, NfL, and GFAP; Dutch cohort; NfL, Danish cohorts), cognition, and activities of daily living (ADL) were evaluated against mortality. NfL was the only biomarker consistently associated with mortality (HR 1.21-1.38), whereas AD-specific biomarkers did not predict mortality despite reflecting post-mortem AD neuropathology. NfL remained associated with mortality independently of cognition and ADL; ADL mediated 13-21% across cohorts and cognition 28%, only where cognitive impairment was widespread. Mortality at extreme age is more closely linked to neuroaxonal injury than to upstream AD pathology, with NfL capturing biological vulnerability beyond cognitive and functional decline.

We report general acceptance (79.0%) of Ebola vaccination in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) between 2023-2024 (n=5,062). Acceptance varied significantly by province with acceptance ranging from 47.6% in Kongo Central to 92.1% in Tshuapa province and was highest among healthcare workers. While Ebola vaccine acceptance and disease knowledge are relatively strong nationally in the DRC, regional differences do exist and may impact future vaccine rollout.

PhenoAge, a blood-based biological aging clock, is associated with cancer outcomes, a finding taken as evidence that biological aging shapes prognosis. In 3,067 patients undergoing primary tumor resection, PhenoAge acceleration rose with tumor stage. One or two of its eight blood components, differing by cancer type, carried the prognostic signal, and replacing its general-population weights with equal weights did not weaken it. In cancer, PhenoAge may reflect disease burden rather than biological aging.

Background: Commercial spaceflight now carries civilians on short missions, yet their stress-axis physiology is poorly described. Earlier shuttle data suggest that sympathetic responses predominate after short flights and glucocorticoid responses after long ones. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a low-cost readout of both. Methods: Preregistered secondary analysis of open clinical laboratory data (NASA Open Science Data Repository OSD-569 and OSD-575) from the four Inspiration4 crew members, each sampled seven times: three draws before launch, one the day after return (R+1) and three during recovery (R+45 to R+194). Log-transformed NLR was modelled with a linear mixed model with a random intercept per crew member and Kenward-Roger inference. Lymphocyte and eosinophil counts and C-reactive protein were secondary outcomes with false discovery rate correction. Results: All 28 draws were analysed. NLR at R+1 did not differ from pre-flight (fold change 1.04; 95% CI 0.81 to 1.34; p = 0.73); two crew members increased (+25% and +46%) and two decreased (-27% and -11%). During recovery NLR was 23% lower than pre-flight (fold change 0.77; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.92; p = 0.005). No secondary outcome changed after correction; lymphocytes were 18% lower at R+1 (95% CI -35% to +4%; q = 0.31). Between-person differences explained 58% of the variance. An ordinary regression ignoring repeated measures missed the recovery effect (p = 0.08). Conclusions: A 3-day orbital flight produced no consistent leukocyte stress signature one day after return. The lower NLR during recovery suggests that pre-flight values, not recovery values, deviate from the resting state, which has implications for how baselines are defined in short-duration spaceflight studies.

Brazil has one of the highest dengue burdens globally, with transmission influenced by climate events. Yet, the effects of compound climate extremes on dengue risk and prediction have not been quantified to date. Using a Bayesian spatiotemporal model of monthly dengue cases across 435 health regions from 2010 to 2025, we estimated relative risk associated with interacting long-lag and short-lag drought indicators and temperature anomalies across nine Koppen-Geiger climatic zones, adjusting for absolute temperature and El Nino-Southern Oscillation. Long-lag dry, mid-lag warm and short-lag wet conditions were associated with the highest relative risk in five climatic zones, with temperature anomalies modifying hydrometeorological dynamics more strongly in temperate than tropical areas. Climate covariates improved the prediction of case counts and outbreaks compared to baseline models at lead times of 1, 3, 6 and 12 months, and for the upcoming season 5 months ahead. Improvements were greatest in the Northeast, Southeast, and Midwest. Recent dengue incidence provided the greatest improvement at the 1-month lead, whereas combining incidence with climate information performed best at 3- and 6-month leads. We extended our framework to weekly state-level predictions of the season ahead to align with national public health planning. We proposed a multi-staged dengue forecasting approach to enhance early warning and response across Brazil.