Expert Systems with Applications

Machine learning (ML) is being considered to help diagnose cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Still, challenges like inconsistent and limited datasets, limited infrastructure, and global inequalities lead to the need for a reliable and practicable ML solution. This paper presents an ML-driven framework for predicting CVD risk scores and classifying status. Several data preprocessing techniques, including multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE), outlier removal, are considered. In addition, hyperparameter tuning is performed with the GridSearchCV tuning technique. Moreover, a consensus-driven five-feature selection method is applied to identify optimal predictors. The dataset used in this study contains healthcare records related to future CVD risk scores, comprising 1,529 patient records with 22 features. The optimized stacked ensemble model is applied to the dataset and achieves a cross-validated coefficient of determination value of 98.13% for CVD risk score regression. Comparative evaluation with other ML models confirmed improved accuracy, efficiency, and interpretability. The explainable AI technique SHAP is applied to interpret predictions and highlight key risk factors. Moreover, a deployment-ready web platform with multi-role access has been developed that demonstrates clinical applicability. The proposed framework offers a reliable and interpretable tool for early detection of CVD and personalized risk assessment. In the future, this work can be extended to integrate longitudinal data, medical imaging, and deep learning to improve generalizability and strengthen real-world impact.

The surge in medical imaging has spurred the development of vision-language models (VLMs) to alleviate radiologist workloads. However, clinical deployment is hindered by the lack of meaningful evaluation frameworks. Current metrics - ranging from semantic similarity to large language model (LLM) based judges - often fail to distinguish between clinically trivial and critical discrepancies, poorly reflecting real-world clinical judgment. To address this, we introduce DISCERN (Discordance and Significance-aware Entity-level Radiology Report Comparison). DISCERN is a significance-aware framework that weighs report errors based on their potential impact on patient care. Our results demonstrate that DISCERN powered by closed source LLMs aligns more closely with expert radiologist assessments than traditional metrics or current LLM evaluators, providing a more interpretable and clinically relevant benchmark. By modeling radiologist prioritization and entity-level feedback, DISCERN facilitates targeted model refinement and ensures the safer integration of generative AI into clinical workflows.

Hybrid mechanistic-statistical models offer interpretability and adaptability for short-term seasonal epidemic forecasting, but it remains unclear whether their accuracy depends more on increased biological complexity or on the assimilation of richer data. Using eight retrospective influenza seasons in North Carolina, we evaluate whether training on historical data and assimilating auxiliary emergency department (ED) visit data improves four-week-ahead hospital admission forecasts more than adding biological complexity (multi-subtype structure and cross-season immunity). Hierarchical Bayesian training on historical data improves accuracy by 22.4 % (95 % CI: 16.4-28.1 %), and inclusion of ED visit data yields a further 5.3 % (95 % CI: 3.0-7.6 %) improvement, whereas added biological complexity produces diminishing or null gains. We further observe a substitution effect in which ED visit data partially compensates for omitted biological structure. We deployed a simplified model variant in the 2025-2026 CDC FluSight Challenge and ranked among the top ensemble performers, supporting the robustness of Bayesian hierarchical training in real time. Together, these findings indicate that short-term forecast accuracy is driven more by historical learning and assimilating auxiliary signals than by biological fidelity, with implications for how forecasting systems should balance mechanistic complexity.

Background: Traditional diagnostic models lack explainability, while multimodal language models prone to hallucination remain unsafe for medical education. An interactive, risk-free artificial intelligence framework is required to serve as a reliable clinical mentor for radiology trainees. Methods: We propose a multi-agent architecture decoupling deterministic image analysis from generative consultation. Specialized computer vision models perform anatomical localization and pathological segmentation. These quantitative outputs are synthesized into a structured payload, which grounds a locally hosted large language model (LLaVA 7B) using strict prompt guardrails and prerequisite protocols. Results: The system effectively eliminates visual hallucinations by intercepting unanchored queries. The artificial intelligence tutor successfully contextualizes spatial anomalies and baseline metrics, generating accurate conversational explanations and formally structured radiology reports while strictly enforcing medical safety disclaimers. Discussion and Conclusion: By anchoring language generation exclusively to verified algorithmic realities, this framework transforms opaque diagnostic models into safe, interactive educational simulators. This establishes a highly reliable paradigm for integrating explainable artificial intelligence into medical training.

We present the TopBrain 2025 Challenge, the first benchmark for fine-grained multiclass segmentation of the whole brain vasculature in both computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). Building on the TopCoW challenge, TopBrain scales vessel annotation from the Circle of Willis to the entire brain, introducing a dataset of 90 annotated volumes across 48 landmark vessel classes spanning arterial and venous systems, of which 50 training volumes are publicly released. Vessel definitions were consolidated from established neuroanatomical references into a unified annotation scheme, and vessel caliber measurements along the centerline are reported for the first time across the whole brain vascular anatomy. To address the unique challenges of multiclass brain vessel segmentation, we propose an evaluation framework that accounts for detection in segmentation performance, assesses anatomical plausibility, and introduces novel contamination metrics that characterize inter-class prediction errors. Fifteen teams from over 220 registered participants submitted algorithms to the benchmark. The top-performing teams built on nnUNet with principled system design choices, achieving around 80% Dice scores, near-zero invalid neighbor counts, over 60% F1 scores for side-road vessels, and below 18% foreground contamination ratio. Larger vessels are easier to segment, while smaller and more complex vessels remain the true bottleneck. The annotated datasets and podium-finish algorithms are made publicly available on Zenodo.

Background: Consensus continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics, including time in range (TIR), time above range (TAR), time below range (TBR), mean glucose, glucose management indicator, and glycemic variability, are essential for modern glucose assessment. However, these whole-day summaries do not explicitly partition nocturnal basal from daytime ambulatory glycemic burden. Objective: To develop and evaluate a complementary domain-based CGM framework that quantifies basal and daytime ambulatory glycemic exposure across oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)-derived dysglycemia phenotypes. Methods: In this observational, clinic-based study, 253 individuals underwent OGTT with insulin measurement and CGM. Participants were classified using a prespecified OGTT-derived phenotyping algorithm, implemented through a deterministic rules-based web calculator, and collapsed into five groups: NoDM, Increased insulin resistance, Midzone Glycemia, Prediabetes, and Diabetes. CGM files were uniformly reprocessed by selecting the latest contiguous episode and retaining the most recent 15 calendar days with data. The 24-hour profile was partitioned into nocturnal basal (00:00 to <06:00) and daytime ambulatory (06:00 to <24:00) domains. Derived indices included Area of Basal Glycemia (ABG), Area of Prandial/Daytime Ambulatory Glycemia (APG), incremental ABG (iABG), incremental APG (iAPG), and exploratory deficit indices dABG and dAPG. Results: The final dataset contributed 3,647 analyzable CGM days. APG remained higher than ABG across all groups. Mean ABG/APG increased from 80.45/86.38 mg/dL in NoDM to 111.96/124.70 mg/dL in Diabetes. Mean iABG/iAPG increased from 5.65/6.60 to 34.12/38.91 mg/dL, whereas dABG/dAPG declined as dysglycemia worsened. Conclusions: The ABG/APG framework provides interpretable, domain-resolved CGM burden metrics that separate basal from daytime ambulatory exposure and distinguish total burden from above-threshold excess. These indices are proposed as adjunctive metrics to support dysglycemia phenotyping, early risk recognition, and treatment monitoring, but are not intended to replace established consensus CGM metrics or diagnostic criteria. External, prospective validation is required.

One of the prominent methods in neuroimaging data processing is SSM-PCA, which is based on principal component analysis and allows for the identification of diagnostically significant patterns in the form of statistical maps. We developed software, PIE Toolbox, employs SSM-PCA and classification based on the obtained diagnostic patterns revealed from functional and structural tomographic brain imaging. The program supports the entire analysis pipeline including preprocessing of brain images, diagnostic patterns extraction, building classification models, and prediction based on them. The resulting diagnostic patterns are weighted principal components obtained through SSM-PCA, or their linear combinations. PIE Toolbox allows selection of relevant structural and functional brain patterns, computation of their expression values in regions of interest, classification using support vector machines, and evaluation of model performance via cross-validation. This approach enables the use of patterns as features of intergroup differences for individual diagnosis. The software has been validated on both simulated and ADNI datasets.

Subjective auditory-perceptual evaluation and uninterpretable deep learning models limit the clinical assessment of voice disorders. This study proposes a two-phase zero-shot framework to evaluate voice pathology. First, an Audio Spectrogram Transformer is fine-tuned on the Perceptual Voice Quality Database to generate an acoustic latent space. Second, Orthogonal Procrustes analysis maps these acoustic embeddings directly onto the semantic space of a pre-trained Sentence Transformer. The geometric alignment produced continuous semantic axes that outperformed a supervised machine learning baseline in regressing clinician-rated GRBAS (Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Strain) severity scales. Furthermore, these axes correlate with traditional acoustic measures, including Harmonics-to-Noise Ratio and local jitter, while remaining robust when applied to aperiodic signals by not requiring fundamental frequency extraction. Most importantly, the model achieved zero-shot semantic expansion, successfully evaluating voices using an untrained, natural clinical vocabulary beyond the GRBAS scale. External validation on the Voice ICarus Database confirmed cross-corpus stability and demonstrated the capacity for zero-shot differential phenotyping of specific etiologies, such as hypokinetic dysphonia and reflux laryngitis. By bridging acoustic and semantic latent spaces, this framework offers an objective, continuous, and transparent metric for evaluating voice quality using voice descriptive vocabulary.

Background and Objective: Access to real-world electronic health records (EHRs) remains limited by privacy, governance and annotation constraints, hindering the development of clinical natural language processing models. Realistic synthetic progress notes may provide EHR-like corpora that preserve clinically rigorous information on diagnoses, treatments, symptoms, imaging, laboratory findings and therapeutic trajectories without relying directly on sensitive patient records. This study evaluates whether large language models (LLMs) can generate realistic Spanish prostate cancer progress notes from published case reports, preserving clinical content, temporality and hospital-style conventions.

Social media has become a critical channel for public health communication during the COVID-19 pandemic, yet how official health messaging aligns with broader public discourse remains insufficiently understood. This study develops an end-to-end info-veillance framework to examine the dynamic relationship between Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) communications and general public discourse on social media. We analyzed 17,524 CDC tweets and 67,895 public discourse tweets. Biterm Topic Model (BTM) was used to extract topics from each corpus, and a novel topic consistency scoring system integrating cosine similarity with daily public topic prominence was developed to quantify temporal alignment between official health communication and public discourse. Two complementary sentiment measures were incorporated: expected sentiment (average emotional tone) and net sentiment (overall emotional intensity). Temporal relationships were examined using autoregressive integrated moving average with exogenous variables (ARIMAX) models. Results show that topic alignment increased over time across CDC topics, while expected sentiment remained consistently negative. Higher alignment was associated with immediate and delayed changes in expected sentiment and stronger emotional intensity in net sentiment based on ARIMAX results. These findings suggest that topic alignment reflects public attention rather than agreement with official communications, and is associated with more negative emotional responses. This framework provides a scalable, generalizable approach to investigate and evaluate public engagement with official health communication.

Robot-assisted hematoma puncture has seen significant development in primary hospitals across the country. Sino Plan software system is the core of the intelligent surgical robot, independently developed by Sinovation.We conducted a comparative study of imaging indicators, such as residual hematoma volume and hematoma clearance rate, as well as prognostic indicators, in patients who underwent hematoma puncture at our hospital over a 9-year period, before and after the introduction of Sino Plan.The results indicated that following the application of Sino Plan, the hematoma clearance rate was significantly enhanced, and the residual hematoma volume was markedly reduced. Regarding patient prognosis, there was no significant difference in GCS scores between the two groups, but the incidence of adverse prognostic events was lower in patients where Sino Plan was utilized.In conclusion, this 9-year retrospective analysis at our hospital reveals that Sino Plan offers distinct advantages. However, its application in certain special cases suggests that further improvements to the software are warranted to better meet the demands of more specific clinical scenarios.

Background: Wearable technologies enable scalable and continuous monitoring of emotional states through passive sensing of physiological and behavioral signals. However, conventional learning approaches often struggle to model the complex temporal, contextual, and relational dependencies underlying human emotions. To address these limitations, we propose a graph-based framework that represents multimodal wearable observations as heterogeneous knowledge graphs enriched with semantic information derived from Large Language Models (LLMs), enabling richer contextual understanding beyond raw sensor measurements. Methods: We constructed a heterogeneous knowledge graph using multimodal Fitbit physiological signals and affective self-report data collected from 45 users. Framing mood prediction and emotion detection was formulated as both binary and ternary node classification tasks. We evaluated five baseline heterogeneous Graph Neural Network (GNN) architectures and compared them with the proposed Semantically Gated Augmented Graph Neural Network (SeGA-GNN) framework, which dynamically integrates LLM-generated semantic embeddings into graph representations through a gated cross-modal fusion mechanism. Results: The baseline GNN models achieved strong performance, with classification accuracies ranging from 0.7525 to 0.9739 for binary classification and 0.6249 to 0.9699 for ternary classification. The proposed SeGA framework consistently improved predictive performance across most architectures. In particular, semantic augmentation transformed the HAN model from moderate baseline performance into near-perfect emotion recognition capability, achieving SeGA-HAN Accuracy = 0.9988 and AUC = 1.0000 for binary classification and Accuracy = 0.9979 and AUC = 1.0000 for ternary classification. Discussion and Conclusion: Integrating LLM-derived semantic contextualization into heterogeneous graph learning enables effective modeling of contextual information that is not directly captured by wearable physiological signals alone. The proposed SeGA-GNN framework demonstrates that adaptive semantic fusion substantially improves the accuracy, robustness, and interpretability of wearable-based emotion detection. These findings establish a promising direction for next-generation wearable affective computing systems and intelligent emotion-aware applications.

Background: Three-dimensional visualization and quantitative analysis of cerebral arteries on 3DRA are central to endovascular treatment planning, device selection, and cerebrovascular research. Manual segmentation is time-consuming and operator-dependent, yet no open-source deep learning model has been prospectively validated for this task on 3DRA. Methods: A nnUNet v2 model was trained for binary cerebral artery segmentation on 400 consecutive 3DRA acquisitions from three angiographic systems, comparing four configurations across architectures and loss functions. The best-performing configurations were prospectively validated on 40 patients using a dual approach: quantitative metrics (DSC, clDice, HD95, ASD, Precision, Recall), and blinded expert qualitative evaluation by two interventional neuroradiologists assessing 12 arterial segments, a global quality score, and clinical usability across 40 test cases. Results: The ensemble model achieved median DSC 0.917, clDice 0.932, and HD95 1.494 mm. Global quality scores were significantly lower for nnUNet v2 than for expert segmentations (median 4 vs 5, p<0.001), but nnUNet v2 segmentations were rated clinically usable in 88-90% of cases versus 95-98% for expert segmentations, without significant difference on the binary usability criterion. A consistent proximal-to-distal quality gradient was identified, with comparable scores at proximal arteries and the largest differences at distal arterial segments. Conclusion: nnUNet v2 with topology-aware training provides clinically usable cerebral artery segmentations on 3DRA, prospectively validated through both quantitative metrics and structured expert qualitative assessment, and represents a reproducible open-source foundation for endovascular and research applications.

Pediatric patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) face limited MRI access due to RF-induced heating, and computational modeling is increasingly used to characterize this risk. The validity of these simulations, however, depends on pairing body models with clinically realistic lead configurations, guidance that is currently lacking. We retrospectively analyzed 302 CIED surgeries in 281 pediatric patients to derive weight-based constraints for simulation design. Weight alone discriminated epicardial from endocardial lead implantation with AUC = 0.90, and adding age and height yielded no improvement, supporting weight as a sufficient single-parameter selection metric. The probabilistic crossover between approaches occurred at 44~kg, substantially higher than the 10 to 15~kg threshold commonly cited in the literature, with a broad transition zone of 21 to 66~kg in which both lead types were routinely used. Lead length was likewise weight-constrained: only 25~cm leads were observed in patients below 6~kg, and leads of 45~cm or longer were uncommon below 50~kg. These findings yield a three-tier framework, with epicardial-only configurations below 21~kg, dual configurations within 21 to 66~kg, and weight-thresholded lead lengths throughout, enabling MRI safety simulations to focus on clinically realizable anatomy and device combinations.

Background As lockdown measures was eased, pregnant women faced an elevated risk of COVID-19 infection, potentially impacting their mental health. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of antenatal depression (AD) post-lockdown and develop predictive models for AD risk using machine learning. Methods A cross-sectional study utilizing the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale was conducted in Beijing and Guizhou, China, from January to August 2023. Data was randomly split into training and test datasets (6:4 ratio), with logistic regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) models trained and compared. The best model underwent further examination, including SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for feature importance, calibration curve (CC) for discrimination, and decision curve analysis (DCA) for clinical benefit. Results The effective response rate was 91.07% (459/504), with 25.7% (118/459) testing positive for AD. Multivariate analysis identified "sleep disorders," "family support level," and "COVID-19 symptom severity" as independent predictors. RF model showed the highest area under the curve in both training (0.842) and testing (0.724) datasets, with SHAP emphasizing the greatest impact of "sleep disorders" on AD. The RF model's calibration (P > 0.05) and clinical utility across thresholds (8%-95% and 10%-58%) were confirmed by CC and DCA, respectively. Conclusions AD strongly correlated with "sleep disorders," "family support level," and "COVID-19 symptom severity" post-lockdown, and the EPDS-based RF model effectively predicted AD risk.

Spousal caregivers of individuals with Alzheimers disease and related dementias frequently experience elevated perceived stress, caregiver burden, and loneliness, which are associated with adverse health outcomes. Early identification is therefore critical for timely intervention. Existing approaches commonly rely on wearable sensor data and standardized psychological questionnaires, while recent multimodal methods aim to improve prediction by integrating behavioral and linguistic information. In this study, we explored three modality configurations, wearable-derived features, interview-based text, and their combination, to classify caregiver psychological risk using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Zarit Burden Interview, and UCLA Loneliness Scale. We compared traditional machine learning models and large language models (LLMs) (Gemini 2.0, Llama 4, and GPT-4o) under psychometrician-centered and caregiver-centered prompting strategies. Traditional machine learning models performed better under multimodal settings, while LLMs achieved stronger performance with Interview-Only input. We further demonstrate that PSS was the most predictable construct and prompting strategies substantially influenced LLM performance.

Background: The development of personalised mRNA cancer vaccines holds considerable promise for oncology, yet a significant translational gap persists between neoantigen identification and the selection of therapeutically impactful targets. Current approaches predominantly prioritise human leukocyte antigen (HLA) binding affinity and immunogenicity, often overlooking the systems-level biological context of the target. This can inadvertently favour immunogenic but biologically peripheral peptides that exert limited influence on tumour signalling networks, thereby constraining vaccine efficacy. Furthermore, mRNA therapeutics must satisfy additional design requirements, including favourable codon usage and favourable secondary-structure stability, which directly affect in vivo translation and half-life. A unified computational framework that integrates neoantigen discovery with network biology is therefore critically needed. Results: Here, we present PimRNA, a Priority index (Pi)-centric computational medicine framework that bridges this gap by unifying neoantigen identification, mRNA sequence optimisation, and gene interaction network analysis. First, high-confidence tumour-specific HLA class I and II neoantigenic peptides are identified from paired tumour-normal genomic and tumour transcriptomic data using NeoDisc. Second, the coding sequences of these peptides are optimised for stability and translational efficiency with LinearDesign, yielding a core set of neoantigen-encoding mRNAs. Third, a random walk with restart algorithm is applied to a knowledgebase of gene interactions to identify peripheral genes exhibiting significant network connectivity to core genes, generating a gene-predictor matrix in which each gene is assigned an affinity score reflecting its network proximity to immunogenic neoantigens. These scores are consolidated into a single, unified priority rating (0-5) for each gene, followed by subnetwork analysis that reveals therapeutically relevant gene modules. Application of PimRNA to breast cancer and melanoma datasets demonstrates that it successfully selects high-confidence immunogenic neoantigen candidates embedded within biologically meaningful tumour-specific networks. Conclusion: PimRNA provides a systems biology foundation for mRNA vaccine design, moving beyond isolated immunogenicity to prioritise targets that are both highly presented and central to tumour-relevant biological networks. This framework offers a generalisable strategy for the rational discovery and prioritisation of mRNA therapeutics, significantly advancing the field of computational medicine towards personalised cancer vaccines.

Objective:This study aims to compare the advantages and disadvantages of DLIR and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) in thin-slice (2.5 mm) CT images of hepatic lesions characterized by high and low contrast. Additionally, the study seeks to determine the optimal DLIR strength for the evaluation of liver lesions. Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on 90 patients who underwent abdominal contrast-enhanced CT scans. Group A comprised 48 patients with low-contrast lesions, while Group B included 42 patients with high-contrast lesions. The acquired images were reconstructed using post-processing DLIR at low (DLIR-L), medium (DLIR-M), and high (DLIR-H) strengths, all with a slice thickness of 2.5 mm (subgroups A1-A3, B1-B3). Furthermore, images were reconstructed with ASIR-V at 50% strength at slice thicknesses of 2.5 mm and 5 mm (subgroups A4/B4 and A5/B5, respectively). CT values and standard deviations (SD) of the liver and lesions were measured, and the corresponding signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. The edge rise slope (ERS) was determined using ImageJ software by measuring CT values along a line from the liver parenchyma to the lesion. Objective metrics were compared using one-way ANOVA, with independent samples t-tests applied for inter-group differences. Subjective scoring, which encompassed noise level, diagnostic confidence, and lesion margin delineation, was conducted by two radiologists, with differences analyzed using the Kappa test. Results: Objective evaluation revealed a progressive decrease in lesion SD and a progressive increase in SNR and CNR from subgroups A1/B1 to A3/B3. The SD of Group A2 decreased by 57.4% compared to A4, while the SNR and CNR of A2 icreased by 19.3% and 24.6% compared to A4. Although subgroup B2 had a lower SNR than B5, the difference was not statistically significant. SNR and CNR in B2 increased by 24.1% and 11.9%, respectively, compared to B4. ERS gradually decreased from A1/B1 to A3/B3. ERS values in A2 and B2 increased by 27.0% and 39.4%, respectively, relative to A5 and B5. Although A3 had a lower ERS than A1 and A2, all DLIR subgroups exhibited higher ERS than A5; similar trends were observed in Group B. Subjective evaluation indicated good inter-reader agreement (Kappa > 0.61, p < 0.05). As DLIR strength increased, noise scores rose progressively in both groups. However, noise in A2 and B2 was lower than in A4/A5 and B4/B5. Diagnostic confidence and lesion margin delineation scores were highest in A2 and B2, while all subjective scores were lowest in A5 and B5. Discussion: Most prior studies evaluated the liver, vessels, or confirmed that image quality can be guaranteed at low doses. However, there are few studies on specific individual lesions. Therefore, this study aims to investigate specific individual lesions. The details and detection rate were analyzed separately to confirm the clinical acceptability of 2.5-mm DLIR image in different contrast lesions. Conclusion: For both high- and low-contrast hepatic lesions, DLIR provides superior image quality compared to ASIR-V, with the 2.5mm DLIR-M setting being optimal. DLIR-M reduces image noise, improves spatial resolution, and produces images more suitable for diagnostic purposes.

Background and Aims: Steatotic liver disease (SLD) has high clinical and public health relevance. Robust population estimates of SLD and its subcategories are challenging due to the limitations of ultrasound measurements or non-invasive scores, particularly for low-grade steatosis. We aimed to quantify SLD prevalence using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the population-based German National Cohort (NAKO). Methods: Hepatic multi-echo Dixon MRI was performed at 5 dedicated study sites with identical setup across Germany. Liver fat (proton density fat fraction, PDFF), R2* as proxy for liver iron, and liver volume were assessed. The resulting data of N = 29'842 individuals (age range 20-72 years) were weighted by survey weights for regional representativeness, resulting in a sample of 50% women and a mean age of 45.6 years. SLD was defined as PDFF [&ge;] 5.75%, and sex-specific prevalence according to age, BMI, socioeconomic status and geographic region was calculated. Results: Overall, SLD prevalence was 21.3% in women and 35.7% in men, and the majority were metabolic dysfunction-associated (MASLD, 89.3% of all SLD cases). Prevalence increased with age in a sex-specific pattern, suggesting potential menopausal effects in women. There was a relevant prevalence of SLD in individuals with normal weight (5.3% in women, 13.2% in men) and the age group <25 years (7.5% in women, 11.9% in women). Differences in prevalence between low and high socioeconomic status were more pronounced in women (37% vs 15.8%) compared to men (45.5% vs 30.3%). Conclusions: Data underscore the high public health relevance of SLD and its subcategory MASLD. The considerable prevalence in groups historically considered low-risk, such as younger or lean individuals, emphasizes the need for raising awareness early.

Objectives: The aim of mammographic screening is the early detection of invasive cancers. In the era of artificial intelligence (AI), this tool may improve diagnosis of earlier stages. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact on selected quality indicators retrospectively. Method: The data source was the Breast Cancer Screening Registry using data from one Screening Unit that currently uses AI routinely. The indicators of the cancer detection rate (CDR), further assessment rate (FAR), and recall rate (RR) in the year 2023, when AI was used, and the year 2022, without AI, in women aged 45-69 were compared. The statistical evaluation used the chi-square test and logistic regression adjusting for the effects of age, a woman's risk level, and the screening round at a 5% significance level. Results: In 2022, without AI, 4,034 women aged 45-69 were included, compared with 4,049 women in 2023 when AI was used. This study showed a non-significant increase in CDR from 5.0 breast cancers detected per 1,000 women (non-AI assessment) to 5.2 (AI-assisted assessment), p = 0.919; OR (95% CI): 1.034 (0.542-1.974), a significant decrease in the FAR from 5.2% to 3.9%, p < 0.001; OR (95% CI): 0.665 (0.529-0.836), and a decrease in RR from 2.4% to 1.9%, p = 0.083; OR (95% CI): 0.754 (0.548-1.037). Conclusion: AI has the potential to be a useful tool in the early detection of breast cancer by improving quality through a decrease in FAR and RR, while probably maintaining CDR.